Ditched LR for C1 3 years ago, none of my macs has more then 16GB RAM and I can run C1, PS and Photomechanic + more at the same time no issues at all with iMac running all of them smooth :). 1 GB Video RAM (VRAM). Everything else is faster. Like most software developers, Adobe maintains a list of Adobe Products System Requirements for all products that can be used to help ensure the hardware in your computer system will work with their multimedia software. He is also an avid equestrian. RAM: At least 4 GB of RAM and that’s for Lightroom only. in Applied Mathematics and a doctorate in Music Composition. Why would you want to import one file? 4 GB of RAM (12 GB recommended) 1024 x 768 display 2 GB of available hard-disk space for program installation. Because what any application gets is total RAM minus what macOS needs minus what other applications need. If you have 64gb of low-grade RAM its probably not going to help if you have 32 gb of high-grade RAM it's probably going to speed up your workflow a lot ! I upgraded it to 16 and then read an article about GPU use. I'm wondering if it it scanning lots of files or drives and needs more RAM, as I tend to have a lot of programs open. Forget Lightroom, wait till you try to run Google Chrome with more than one tab open! For many users even with a relatively new computer (2 years old) with a Macbook Pro with Intel HD 4000 384 megs built in VRAM, and NIVIDEA GeForce GT650 PCIe 512 megs of VRAM a total of 896 megs of VRAM and still it is not enough Video Ram for the new Lightroom. Thanks but no. If only more RAM could consistently resolve all of Lightroom's various performance issues. Change a few sliders on several raw images and it goes up to 4GB of memory. Windows 7 home premium.RAM 4.00 GB . Check out the full video up top to see the head-to-head comparisons for yourself, and then share your ideal build (PC or Mac) for photo editing below. Definitely random. Our creative, marketing and document solutions empower everyone — from emerging artists to global brands — to bring digital creations to life and deliver them to the right person at the right moment for the best results. Just don’t go overboard—even if your processor can support it, 128GB or RAM may not run Lightroom any faster than 32GB or 64GB unless you’re really overloading your system elsewhere (*cough* Google Chrome *cough*). Adobe is changing the world through digital experiences. So then I try to import one image and sometimes it takes a minute before it starts. According to Adobe the system requirements for Lightroom 6 is a VRAM of 1GB or higher. For now, 8GB is a comfortable amount of RAM for pretty heavy image processing. Just don’t go overboard—even if your processor can support it, 128GB or RAM may not run Lightroom any faster than 32GB or 64GB unless you’re really overloading your system elsewhere ( … When available, Lightroom will and does use more than 8GB of ram. Check out the Fstoppers Store for in-depth tutorials from some of the best instructors in the business. In preferences, the name of the GPU available to Lightroom and its available video memory is displayed. Create amazing photos at your desk or on the go. At the bare minimum, Lightroom requires 4 GB of RAM to run, but of course, this may not be enough in practical terms when it comes to day-to-day needs. I might take some photos and I need one, like of a product I'm working on or of my cat. Some less tech-y types tend to think that “More RAM” always equals “Better Performance,” but that’s not always the case. For example if you wish to run other applications like Photoshop, that would really cut into the 8GB RAM. Please refer to the system requirements in the Help documentation for a full list of hardware and software requirements for Lightroom CC." This also significantly help when using multiple or high-resolution monitors. Lightroom CC 2015 (version 6.0) system requirements: Windows. LR issues are not RAM issues, this program has to be redesign from scratch. Photographers can almost always use more RAM, particularly when they start working with larger and more complex files. On my old i7-3770K I had 32GB of RAM and the program & catalog on SSDs and sometimes it was just unbearably slow, including delays when doing spot removal that would cause it to misread where I clicked or drew a line (sometimes producing crazy shapes). I average 12 seconds per image (weddings) and edit 750 images in around 2.5 hours. Catalog sizes stay about the same after the upgrade, with catalog sizes changing by 1-2% (up or down), depending on the size of the catalog. That seems to be a big jump between 5 and 6. When I bought my PC, it came with 12 gigs of RAM. Regardless, mine come in off a card at about 100MB per second - that's about 2.5 files per second from a 24MP camera. Is This Plagiarism or Crazy Coincidence in Landscape Photography? Coming to you from Signature Edits, this great video compares the speed of Lightroom when using 8 GB of RAM versus 32 GB of RAM. Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. This Software really needs a redesign from scratch. Coming to you from Signature Edits, this great video compares the speed of Lightroom when using 8 GB of RAM versus 32 GB of RAM. I always copy to my hard drive and remove cards before I import in LR, or things get really slow. There are two primary factors to weigh up when selecting a new CPU: the number of cores on the single CPU (two physical CPU’s don’t help much) and it’s clock speed.Lightroom makes good use of multiple cores for image processing tasks such as building previews, working in the Develop module, and exporting photos, so it’s worth selecting a quad-core processor if possible, even though other areas of the program are … If no information is displayed, then you may need to install a new driver for your GPU, or your hardware or operating system does not meet the minimum system requirements. Canon’s New Full-Frame Camera Can Shoot at ISO 4,500,000, 9 Things That Make Leica Rangefinders Different from Other Digital Cameras, Kayaker Films Herself Almost Getting Swallowed by a Humpback Whale, Johnny Depp Plays Photographer W. Eugene Smith in ‘Minamata’, Photographer Declares Nikon Z6 II the Go-To for Weddings and Events, Sony is Giving Away Tiny Cameras and Lenses with Purchases, My Process for Creating Insect Portraits with Macro Photography, Canon Adds 70-200mm f/4L IS and 50mm f/1.8 STM Lenses to RF Lineup, If Your iPhone Has a Green Dot in iOS 14, Your Camera May Be Spying On You, Photoshop Virtual Summit II: 5 Days of Free Photoshop Training by Top Pros, Photo of Turtle ‘Flipping the Bird’ Wins Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards, 70 Inspirational Quotes for Photographers, Yongnuo Unveils Oval-Shaped Flash With Built-In Modeling Light, This $22,000 Photobook of the Sistine Chapel Was Made with 270,000 Photos, Nikon Officially Launches Webcam Software for Both Mac and Windows, How to Add Believable Snow to an Image in Photoshop, How to Build a Fake Sun That Looks Unbelievably Realistic, AI Tracking Camera Mistakes Referee’s Bald Head for a Soccer Ball, Kodak Professional Select Uses AI to Auto-Cull Your Images. At the bare minimum, Lightroom requires 4 GB of RAM … Creativity is One of the Least Desirable Traits in a Partner, Study Finds. My interpretation of how Lightroom (and most programs work) is to re-word what you said to: When available, Lightroom will and does use more than 8GB of ram when it is needed. I always write to XMP and don't have any issues. Starting up Lightroom the program immediately takes 1.5GB of memory. Many operations in the program are rather resource intensive, and this in tandem with ever-increasing file sizes can cause the program to really bog down and make working difficult, particularly when you are working with large sets of images and trying to find a workflow rhythm, even if you are technically working with enough RAM for the program to at least boot up and run. I do all my editing in LR so i bought a single threaded cpu (i7-9700k), an m2 ssd, 16 ram and a new gpu and its lightning fast for me. Based on the Activity Monitor readings, Lightroom topped out around 20-25GB of RAM use once it had enough to pull from, so you’ll want to have at least that amount in your computer for the best possible performance. You just need to figure out why that is. You had these issues and discovered something. Dramatically Speed up Lightroom Performance, Three Things You Shouldn't Do in Lightroom, Fstoppers Introduction to Adobe Lightroom, Cheap But Sharp: A Look at the Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC Lens, Edit an Aerial View Toy Town Tilt-Shift Effect in Photoshop CC, How to Create Better Compositions Using a Telephoto Lens for Landscape Photography, A Review of the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens, LuminarAI​ Is Out: Fstoppers Takes a Look at This New Software, Behind the Scenes of Elf: How Forced Perspective Turned a Low Budget Film Into a Christmas Classic. The idea is that you use LR to Import all your images as you shoot them. That's just a possible source of slow-downs if you leave it checked AND do a lot of brush work on your images. Once that's done (once) it's perfectly speedy. I might use RawTherapee sometimes to open one file to save time as it can open one image quickly. Its also got a dual core processor, not quad core. Even Lightroom 1 never supported such a horrid processor. BTW, make sure 'Automatically write to XMP' is turned off. Adobe recommends a minimum of 1 GB of Video RAM (VRAM), but 2 GB of VRAM or more are recommended for 4K+ monitors. I think a combination of processor, fast SSD and RAM are key to getting best performance out of your computer, most people seem to assume that 'just put 16GB of RAM' in will solve the issue when in fact its only a small part of the process. Only thing that's slower in C1 is Export to JPG, for some reason. The newest version was released on November 4, 2019. LR software engineers are starved by their unethical executives. On my old system the problems came and went or at least varied in severity at times depending on the version of LR and not much else as far as i could tell. 32GB ram, 360,000 images. 32GB? System type - 64 - bit operating system. LR is not meant to be used as a casual browser - it's a catalogue app. If you are using Photoshop at the same time, you will need more, much more…. Given that there are, in fact, plenty of users for whom it *does* work well, LR clearly *can* work well. Both have 21.5" screens and plenty of RAM. LR is a pig with memory and Mr. Cooke does not know what he is talking about. 8GB? Maybe because they run more in-depth algorithms on the RAWs. Tell us. Alex Cooke is a Cleveland-based portrait, events, and landscape photographer. Internet connection and registration are necessary for required software activation, validation of subscriptions, and access to online services.† Graphics processor acceleration requirements