}; DivID: '', Warum ist Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 besser als AMD Radeon RX 590? 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. ... GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is one of Nvidia's lower end graphics card. Again, the GTX 970 was 12% slower than the R9 290, though despite that performance was still very playable. At least today we can settle which GPU offers the best performance in 2019. It’s no surprise that both cards blitzed this rally racer at 1080p: the RX 480 averaged 88.9fps, while the Nvidia card was about nine frames faster. There’s very little to choose between these two cards in the synthetic 3D Mark Fire Strike test. Here the 970 was 18% faster, delivering 87 fps on average. Keywords: '', AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) remove from comparison. PublisherID: '585309391442756', Fortnite is a game that favors Nvidia GPUs thanks to its use of the Unreal Engine 4. Performance in Just Cause 4 was similar using either GPU. Architecture The GTX 970 was the newer product and unsurprisingly it came in offering a little extra performance at a slightly better price. Both cards also managed to beat 30fps at 4K, which isn’t too surprising considering that this is a less intensive game. The card based on the GM204 Maxwell chip, that is already available in the desktop GeForce GTX 970 … EVGA. Nvidia grabbed recent headlines with its flagship GPU launches, but AMD stole some of that thunder with the new Radeon RX 480. The Radeon’s top temperature of 70°C is an excellent result, and it means there’s no need to fret about overheating.Performance Conclusions. On average the 970 was 14% slower. This is a GPU designed for Full HD and 1440p gaming, and in those department it’s stop on – but any higher resolutions will cause it to struggle. Expect slightly different results with different models. Text_Color: '', Both cards beat the magical 60fps figure, with the Nvidia silicon almost four frames ahead. Still the GeForce 970 was faster by a 5% margin or greater in 16 of the 33 games tested, while the R9 290 was faster by a 5% margin or greater in just 11 of the games. That’s good, but don’t expect either of these GPUs to handle 4K gaming. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. So today we’ve got an old fashioned GPU battle pitting the GeForce GTX 970 against the Radeon R9 290. Next up we have Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and here the GTX 970 is more competitive than I was expecting. The GTX 970 is similarly quick at those resolutions and is a tad cheaper, but it doesn’t have the new architecture, the extra memory or the software improvements – as you’d expect for an older card, of course. PlacementID: 'plte5ygLBZuT8RrDXzB', The RX 480 maintained its slim advantage with an average of 39.3fps. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon RX 590: Which mid-range budget graphics card should you buy? That means the GTX 970 had an 8.63% lead, but the gap closed to 5.81% at 1440p – perhaps because the RX 480 is flexing its extra transistors and memory. Architecture In other words, this is one of the best GTX 970s around versus an early RX 480 that’ll surely improve over time with third-party manufacturers pre-overclocking it and adding beefy cooling systems. The GTX 970 uses the older 28nm manufacturing process, which means it has half a billion fewer transistors than its rival, and it only has 1,664 stream processors. Performance at 1080p using the ultra quality preset certainly was respectable and you won’t need to turn down any quality settings here. Buy Now: AMD Radeon RX 480 at Amazon.com from $199.99. The 8GB card will have faster memory, too, with throughput of 8Gbps compared to 7Gbps from the lesser card. The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. For those wondering back when we reviewed the GTX 1060 6GB at launch, the 970 was 15% slower, so no ‘Nvidia gimping’ as it’s often referred to appears to have taken place. UserBenchmark USA-User . The GTX 970 also stacks up really well in Metro Exodus with an average of 48 fps at 1080p using the ultra quality settings. Throughout 2015 the GTX 970 was typically the puncher GPU and with a slew of quality AIB models to pick from, it easily outsold the R9 290. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. If they drop in price even further, they’re still an excellent buy. It has a reasonable 2,304 stream processors divided into 36 Compute Units for more granular task delegation, and its core sits at stock and boost speeds of 1,120MHz and 1,266MHz. That’s a bigger leap than Nvidia has taken with its new 16nm Pascal cards, and it means that AMD can cram even more transistors into the same area without increasing heat and power consumption. scp.async = true; My testing looked at an EVGA-overclocked GTX 970 and a reference RX 480. (function (v,i) { We promise the order of the games wasn’t chosen on purpose but here we have yet another title that works extremely well with AMD GPUs. It doesn’t sound like much of a contest on paper, but the benchmarks reveal a far closer fight than I expected. That supports my conclusions from real-world tests: the GTX 970 might be better in lower resolutions and easier games, but the RX 480 is a more efficient architecture and deploys its power with more aplomb – therefore it takes key victories in tougher tests. Finally a solid win for the GTX 970, this time testing with Hitman 2 using the DirectX 11 API. AMD also does well in The Division 2, Sniper Elite 4, Forza Horizon 4, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 v AMD Radeon RX 480 – Performance I’ve tested these powerful cards with five games. That’ll help when managing CPU and GPU workloads in games with DirectX 12, but it’s not a feature that’ll be coming to the GTX 970. With those comparisons previously established it comes as no surprise that the R9 290 dusts the GTX 970 beating it by a 19% margin. Still in three of the more recently released titles we’ve seen the R9 290 doing well. This is why we typically call it a tie when the margin is 5% or less. So a very solid result for the old Maxwell GPU. We’re completely attributing the R9 290’s comeback to AMD’s driver development and not anything to do with the partitioned VRAM buffer or Nvidia neglecting driver support. Despite its 3.5GB of fast VRAM, the GTX 970 remains the more reliable performer which might surprise some of you, especially after you’ve no doubt heard over and over again how it’s doomed and will be completely useless before too long. var scp = v.createElement("script"), 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB GDDR5 (256 Bit) DVI-D, 2xHDMI, 2xDP (11265-31-20G) Lite-On iHAS124-14 SilentiumPC Armis AR3 TG (SPC199) HyperX DDR4, 16GB, 3200MHz, CL16 (HX432C16PB3K2/16) MSI B450 TOMAHAWK AMD Ryzen 5 2600 3.9GHz, 16MB, BOX (YD2600BBAFBOX) XFX TS Single Rail 650W (P1-650G-TS3X) Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SATA3 … We may earn a commission if you click a deal and buy an item. It’s a competitive set of results for a title that’s among the toughest benchmarks around thanks to its reliance on high-end lighting and particle effects. Built on the 40 nm process, and based on the GF110 graphics processor, in its GF110-351-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. The system that I’m testing with has an Intel i7-8700K CPU overclocked to 5.0GHz in an MSI Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon motherboard, along with 16GB of T-Force Night Hawk CL16 memory from Team Group … Nvidia’s card continued its 1080p lead with an average framerate of 85.4fps, but its advantage was a slim 2fps – and it was overturned when I turned the resolution up to 2,560 x 1,440. The GTX 970 mimicked the GTX 1060 3GB, or I guess you could say the 1060 mimics the 970, either way performance was decent despite trailing the R9 290. Now if you’ve been holding out all these years for a $300-$400 upgrade, the GeForce RTX 2060 might be of interest. 24.4 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? I benchmarked the GTX 970 and RX 480 on TrustedReviews’ test rig, which has been designed to match the specifications of a standard enthusiast gaming PC. Based on 927,070 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 570 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. Both of these GPUs managed to run the benchmark at 4K, too. Based on 1,226,223 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 580 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. There’s a clear trend to be seen across most of my test games: if a game is a tougher benchmark, the RX 480 tends to outperform its older rival. It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … This is why GTX 970 graphics cards typically run cooler and quieter than R9 290 cards. It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … Guidance requested regarding upgraded configuration of computer, Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work. The Radeon’s average of 54.3fps will ensure smooth gameplay at this higher resolution. As evidenced by Vega 64 beating the GTX 1080 and RTX 2060, while the RX 580 crushed the GTX 1060. Based on what we’ve seen so far we don’t imagine the GTX 970 is still 10-15% faster like what most reviewers found back in late 2014. Rise of the Tomb RaiderMax Settings at 1,920 x 1,080 average
GTX 970: 60
RX 480: 63.5Max Settings at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 36.7
RX 480: 44.2Max Settings at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 19.9RX 480: 27.3Tomb Raider strains graphics cards with trickier weather and lighting effects than most other titles on the market. Prices fluctuate pretty rapidly, which is why the GTX 970 is such a close competitor to the RX 480. That’s how the GTX 970 and R9 290 stack up in those preliminary titles, seemed as though we saw quite a bit of back and forth. The Radeon averaged 27.33fps at 4K. Middle-earth: Shadow of MordorUltra at 1,920 x 1,080 average
GTX 970: 85.4
RX 480: 83.6Ultra at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 55.9RX 480: 57.2Ultra at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 37.7
RX 480: 39.3. i[btoa('video intelligence start')].init(config); I was surprised when the AMD hardware took a slim lead: its 34.7fps average is 0.3fps ahead of the Nvidia card. That means the game isn’t playable at its maximum settings at 3,840 x 2,160, but it was a whopping 37.61% faster than the GTX 970 in the same test. This one’s too close to call and well within the margin of error. To give credit where credit is due, the Radeon R9 290 is also extremely impressive in 2019. setTimeout( function() { For this test we have 33 games tested at 1080p, a suitable resolution for these GPUs. New hardware has caused that card to drop in price, which means it’s now a key challenger for AMD’s card. But, of course, there are external factors to consider as well. That said let’s see what the 33 game comparison has for us. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super: Which Graphics Card to Buy for 1440p Gaming? This iteration yields 10% higher clock speeds compared to the RX 580 which is fuelled by an increased power draw from 185W to 225W. (v.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || v.documentElement.appendChild(v.createElement('head'))).appendChild(scp); Whether you're looking to upgrade or not, it should be interesting to see after 5 years which GPU is the ultimate winner... Quickly rewinding for a moment, Nvidia revealed the GTX 970 for the first time in September 2014, some ten months after the Radeon R9 290’s release. Language: 'en-us', The GTX 970 did well in this title and as we’ve seen many times already, it’s often very similar to the 3GB GTX 1060. The GeForce pulled ahead in our test when looking at the average frame rate, however the 1% low result was identical with both managing 40 fps, so overall the experience was much the same. The AMD Radeon RX 560 for laptops (RX 560M) is a mid-range Polaris 11 / 21 gaming graphics card for … This game is full of particle and fire effects, which can make it a little tricky for some GPUs, especially considering I run this test at Ultra settings. FontSize: '', The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 sits in the middle of Nvidia’s latest range, but it’s not got new hardware inside – its Maxwell architecture first debuted in 2013’s mainstream GTX 750 Ti card. The new AMD Radeon RX 590 is an uprated version of the RX 580 on the smaller 12nm process node. It’s a victory for the RX 480 in most of the important tests, then, but don’t go thinking that AMD’s cut-price card will handle 4K gaming smoothly. Either way it’s not great news for the red team. © 2020 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved. For the testing, I’m using the MSI GAMING GeForce GTX 970 4GB and Gigabyte Radeon RX 580 8GB Gaming graphics cards. This is also the only game where the RX 480 led the way at every resolution and opened up a wider lead over the GTX 970 as I increased the pixel count. Those 34fps averages will be undermined by sluggish minimum framerates, especially when the on-screen action becomes more frantic. Compare AMD Radeon RX 590 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 side-by-side. ChannelID: '5f2bc16e3709e324807ce0c1', The 'fine wine' here is all about AMD getting on top of driver optimization over the past few years. AMD’s slow driver development. AMD has made the unusual decision to debut its Polaris architecture with this mid-range card. The red team has made bold claims about its new card, saying that it’s the best 1440p and VR-ready card for around £200. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons window.addEventListener( 'load', function() { The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. That said the 1% low performance was more consistent, though the experience was still extremely smooth with the 970. Intro The GeForce GTX 970 has clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. 17.76 GPixel/s höhere Pixelrate? } ); AMD’s card has some software features that have also been introduced on Nvidia’s new hardware, like better asynchronous computing. That’s clear evidence of the newer architecture, increased memory throughput and shrunken manufacturing process paying dividends. This meant it was 23% faster than the R9 290, placing it basically on par with 6GB GTX 1060 and RX 590. The RX 480 maintained a good lead at 4K, too. XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1405MHz OC+, 8gb 256bit GDDR5, DX12 VR Ready, Double Dissipation, Dual BIOS, 3xDP HDMI DVI, PCI-E AMD Graphics Card (RX … Mike has worked as a technology journalist for more than a decade, writing for most of the UK’s most well-known websites and magazines. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). BG_Color: '', And, finally, it’s cooler – albeit only by three degrees. Its average of 30.6fps is five frames better than the GTX 970 and it does break the important 30fps barrier, but don’t assume that it’ll play Hitman smoothly at 4K without compromising on several of the graphics options. So the GeForce GTX 970 was the more consistent performer, the smaller 3.5GB primary VRAM partition will have hurt it in Wolfenstein, especially with the settings used for testing. With the release of the GeForce GTX 1660, Nvidia is resetting its midrange GPU line and putting AMD's Radeon RX 590 square in the crosshairs. Synthetic Benchmarks, Power and Heat3D Mark Fire Strike Ultra
GTX 970: 2767
RX 480: 2638Peak power:
GTX 970: 260W
RX 480: 249WPeak temperature:
GTX 970: 73
RX 480: 70. We haven’t tested the GTX 1060 in 3GB form, but we have full benchmarks of the 6GB version, which show it’s a worthy 1440p card. This is how we make money. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. Frame rates were surprisingly similar when testing with Battlefield V, here the GTX 970 was just 3 fps faster which comes to be a 5% margin. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. }, 2000 ); Radeon RX 580 GeForce GTX 970; GPU Name: Ellesmere (Ellesmere XT) vs: GM204 (GM204-200-A1) Fab Process: 14 nm: vs: 28 nm: Die Size: 232 mm²: vs: 398 mm²: Transistors